Only the good die young
Published on January 6, 2006 By O G San In International
I happened to be in east Berlin in 1994 when the DDR’s long-time dictator Erich Honecker passed away in his South American exile. On hearing the news, my host reflected on his passing succinctly: "That’s one more for tea tonight, Satan."

His words come to mind today as Ariel Sharon lies close to death in Jerusalem. It would be comforting to think that the Bulldozer will soon be sitting down to dinner with the Devil. But one of the disadvantages of being an atheist is that we do not believe in an afterlife. For us after death there is nothing; no paradise for those who were good and no eternal damnation for those who were wicked.

I don’t have the comfort of believing that Sharon’s many sins will come back to haunt him once he has shuffled off this mortal coil. A man who spent decades inflicting suffering will die a free man at the end of a long life. Most of his innocent victims never lived long enough, as he did, to comb grey hair.

Let there be no doubt, Sharon was a man whose hands dripped, nay cascaded, with the blood of the innocent. His supporters will wish to remember him as the brilliant military leader of 1967 and 1973. But Sharon was never a man to limit the use of force to other armies. From the Qibya massacre of 1953, to the Gaza suppression of the early1970s, to the Sabra and Chatila massacres of 1982, innocent civilians often felt the force of this maniac. Sharon was a murderer of the vilest nature. It is as such that he should be remembered.

And also as a liar. The young Sharon was a protege of David Ben-Gurion when in the 1950s he led the murderous Unit 101. But even the old man was never foolish enough to trust him. Later Sharon would dupe his country into a full-scale invasion of Lebanon from which Israel took two decades to extricate itself. The blood cost of this deception was high and, as ever, most of it was paid by Arabs. In his later days, even as he bestrode the Israeli political scene, allegations of corruption swirled around him and his family.

It is this man, this liar and murderer, who is now lauded in western capitals. "We are praying for his recovery. Prime Minister Sharon is a man of courage and peace," according to the US president. British foreign secretary Jack Straw praised the old man’s "courage and statesmanship". Ignoring a lifetime of murder, they point forlornly to last year’s Gaza pullout as evidence that Sharon had changed that, at the end of his life, he tried to make peace.

Much is made of the Gaza evacuation, as if Israel deserves a big pat on the back for belatedly and partially complying with international law. Did the Syrians receive any warm words from the west when they finally ended their occupation of Lebanon?

The fools who welcomed the Gaza pull-out as the first step towards peace in the Middle East are deluding themselves. Sharon, ever the pragmatist, evacuated Gaza in order to strengthen his hold on the West Bank. In return for removing a few thousand crackpots from Gaza, Arik got explicit American endorsement of "existing Israeli population centres" in the West Bank for the first time. Give a little, gain a lot, this is "generosity" Sharon-style.

But this is not the story you will hear from Sharon’s supporters who beat their breast at the passing of this "giant of the peace process". It s no surprise that Bush, Blair and all the other war criminals should mourn the passing of one of their own, a man who, like them, has unleashed mayhem on Arabs. A man who, like them, deceived his own compatriots into supporting his insane wars. A man who, like them, deserves to be breaking bread with Beelzebub.

But for Bush, Blair and their neo-con cabal there is bad news. Sharon, moral cripple that he was, actually stands above the leaders in Washington and London. Arik was a killer and a liar, but he was no coward. When he sent young men off to kill, he wasn’t asking them to do anything that he himself hadn’t done. Bush and Blair, who have sent so many soldiers to their deaths, have never heard a shot fired in anger in their lives. Next to them, Sharon starts to look a little better. Rather a hawk than a chicken-hawk.

Even this vilest of men can look down his nose at Messrs. Bush and Blair.

Comments (Page 1)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Jan 06, 2006
for this you get an insightful from me...
do me a great favor... email me at manopeace@gmail.com
thanks!
on Jan 06, 2006
There is no crime in killing the enemy. If Israel fights back it is a criminal state, but it surrenders and becomes noble to you lot.

on Jan 06, 2006
Incredible piece, OG San, good job.
on Jan 06, 2006
"But for Bush, Blair and their neo-con cabal there is bad news."

Blair is not a neo con. He is a centre left politician. He and Bush have different ideas about the Middle East, Bush believes that it must be part of pax Americana but Blair believes that democracy can only come from within.
on Jan 06, 2006
Tony,

"There is no crime in killing the enemy."

So 9-11 was OK then?

"He is a centre left politician."

Please.
on Jan 06, 2006
"So 9-11 was OK then? "


I am talking in a military context, Sharon was always and remained military man. 9/11 was a terrorist act on civilians, as are suicide bombings in Israel.
on Jan 06, 2006
Internationally, Blair is quite right wing. But domestically (which is most important) he is centre left e.g. tax credits, increased NHS funding etc.

Iraq may be a serious issue, but to the British people it is irrelevant which is why Blair won in May. Who cares if civilians are dying if my hospital isn't clean?!
on Jan 06, 2006
Tony... this is an excerp of a Sharon Biography posted by CNN today...

Hundreds of Palestinian civilians were massacred at the
Sabra and Shatila refugee camps by Christian Lebanese
militia allied to Israel in 1982. An Israeli inquiry
found Sharon indirectly liable for the deaths as he did
nothing to stop the militias and he resigned as defense
minister in 1983.


Key word is CIVILIANS.
Sharon is a murderer and nothing or no one can change that fact.
on Jan 06, 2006
"indirectly liable"

"murderer"

Unless he gave the order he is not a killer. Hitler was a killer, so was Stalin, Sharon is NOT.

on Jan 06, 2006
Thousands of Israelis have been killed by Palestinian bombers, but they are freedom fighters?

War is war, and all is fair.
on Jan 06, 2006
Although I am outraged at this article I will behave.

Why is it when A JEW kills he is a murderer and when A Palestinian kills he is a hero and freedom fighter?

To Put Sharon as a Murderer and then put Yasser Arafat as a man of peace, awarding him the Nobel peace prize shows the hypocrisy of how the world relates to the JEWS.
on Jan 06, 2006
Why is it when A JEW kills he is a murderer and when A Palestinian kills he is a hero and freedom fighter?

Palestine was already present before Israel was created after World War II as a place for displaced Jews, I think that is why some are more sympathetic to Palestinians.

To Put Sharon as a Murderer and then put Yasser Arafat as a man of peace

Yasser was certainly as despicable a man as Sharon, just because one highlights the faults of Sharon does not mean one commends Arafat.
on Jan 06, 2006
How noble of you to write such an insulting column when the man is on his deathbed. Interesting you had to lie to make your point. I guess there weren't enough facts to make a persuasive argument so you had to fabricate some. Or maybe you simply got them from anti-Israel, antisemitic sources.

While Israel isn't perfect and has done some things that have compromised their integrity to some extent, they've showed great restraint considering their neighbors want to wipe them off the map.
on Jan 06, 2006
Yasser was certainly as despicable a man as Sharon, just because one highlights the faults of Sharon does not mean one commends Arafat.


Thank you Deference.
on Jan 06, 2006
Reply By: DeferencePosted: Friday, January 06, 2006Why is it when A JEW kills he is a murderer and when A Palestinian kills he is a hero and freedom fighter?Palestine was already present before Israel was created after World War II as a place for displaced Jews, I think that is why some are more sympathetic to Palestinians.


gee lets look at ancient history, yep there it is Israel, long before WW2. The was no country as palistine when Israel was "created" but this is just more anti-semitic thinking along the lines of "the holocaust never happened"
3 Pages1 2 3