Published on September 7, 2005 By O G San In International
In times of crisis you get the measure of a person and perhaps, of a country. My overriding impression of the last great American disaster, 9-11, was how it showed up the innate goodness of so many Americans, from the fire fighters who put civic duty above their own survival to the passengers of flight 93 who sacrificed their own lives for the common good. Even the members of Congress, not a group I usually speak of fondly, rose to the occasion that day, with their singing of God Bless America. On any other day such a display would have had me reaching for the sick bag but, on 9-11, it struck just the right chord of defiance and unity.

In the face of human savagery, America emerged with great credit but, in the wake of nature’s wrath, we have witnessed all that is wrong with the States. From the ineptitude of the bureaucracy, to the cynicism of the profiteers, to the callous way that New Orleans poor were left to their fate, Hurricane Katrina has exposed the dark side of the American dream.

The week of anarchy in Louisiana has held up a mirror to America and the reflection is not a pretty sight. Why were the levees not properly reinforced? Why was the head of FEMA unaware that people were taking shelter in the Convention Center? Why were so many of the National Guard “defending” Americans in the Persian Gulf but not the Gulf of Mexico? Most of all why were so many of New Orleans’ poor simply left to rot for days?

Race, America’s great festering wound, was also held up to the light in New Orleans last week. The city’s poor, overwhelmingly black, were abandoned to nature’s tender mercies. No provision was made either to evacuate them or to provide for them within the city. By the time help did arrive, it was too late for some. All of us know, deep in our hearts, that this was racist, that had those in the Superdome been white rather than black, they would have been helped sooner.

While 9-11 and Katrina have shown diametrically opposed visions of America, one constant in both tragedies has been the appalling performance of the country’s “commander”-in-chief. There are no two ways about it, George W Bush does not do crisis well. He was far too slow to grasp the magnitude of last year’s tsunami. A crueller man than me would describe his performance on 9-11 as cowardly. Once again, when confronted by the unexpected last week, the US president has come up well short, failing to appreciate the depth of the crisis until it was too late.

Hurricane Katrina will provide plenty of talking points for the Bush is great/Bush is useless debate which runs constantly on Joeuser and elsewhere. Those who support Dubya will find a scapegoat for his failings as they always do. Those of us who detest the man will write nasty things about him, and rightly so, the man deserves it. But one should be careful to avoid the fate of the apocryphal Irish republican who, on feeling the first drops of rain upon his hair, resolves to blame this inconvenience on the English.

There are some things in this world which are not the fault of George W Bush. While it is very true that he must take his share of responsibility for the horrendous loss of life in the deep south, it is also true that the death toll from Hurricane Katrina was caused by deep underlying forces in American society which long pre-date the Bush administration. It is easy, too easy, to blame it all on Bush.

If 9-11 showed what was good about the US - the willingness to put the common good before the individual even to the point of death - then Katrina exposed the reverse, a long-held tendency to put one's own welfare above everything else.

On the most immediate level this includes those who took the opportunity presented by the storm to do a little shopping. But at a deeper level, Katrina showed up the "I'm alright, Jack" attitude of those in power who abandoned the poor and sick to their fate. What's more, the hurricane exposed the "private good, public bad" attitude, so prevalent in US politics, which left one of America's major cities without adequate flood protection.

For a few horrible days in New Orleans last week the demented slogan of the free-marketeers became policy. It was sink or swim.

Comments
on Sep 07, 2005
I was interested to see what your point of view on this would be.

Just one correction--Brown claims to have been unaware of the people in the Convention Center--not the Superdome (still a ridiculous claim).

I think that you have to be very careful when you make a comparison between this and 9/11. 9/11 happened in one city--in a couple of blocks radius (a very small geographic area with only one local/state government having jurisdiction). It was very easy for Mayor Guiliani to take center stage and become the leader in charge--no one was going to challenge him for authority. It was his city.

Katrina affected more than three states--each with their own series of local and state governmental agencies. There was no easily identifiable leader to take control, and no one has willingly stepped into the position. (This, of course, doesn't make up for the fact that essential steps were not taken before the storm to ensure safety of the people of NO--but are you really going to tell me that Mayor Nagin's failture to commandeer the buses to evacuate the people of his city is racist? Or his failure to make sure that the Superdome had adequate supplies? Because honestly, that would have saved the most lives--had Mayor Nagin done those things, with readily available resources before the storm, many lives would have been saved. His failure to do so was purely incompetence on his part.

So, yes, Katrina highlights a failure, and a huge one--a failure of leadership that is intrinsic in a bureaucratic, federalist system. I don't think that it showed a tendency (on a whole, yes there are some examples) of putting one's own welfare above all else.

Only sort of related, I saw this on Countdown the other night, and thought you might appreciate the perspective Link--especially this part:

But, nationally, these are leaders who won re-election last year largely by portraying their opponents as incapable of keeping the country safe. These are leaders who regularly pressure the news media in this country to report the reopening of a school or a power station in Iraq, and defies its citizens not to stand up and cheer. Yet they couldn't even keep one school or power station from being devastated by infrastructure collapse in New Orleans — even though the government had heard all the "chatter" from the scientists and city planners and hurricane centers and some group whose purposes the government couldn't quite discern... a group called The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.


Sorry that was a bit more long-winded than I thought it would be...
on Sep 07, 2005
Thanks for the comment. I read the link, very intersting.

I stand corrected on the Superdome. But allow me to correct you - 9-11 took place in three states not one. Plus there were many things going on that day for which Guiliani had no responsibility, not least the grounding of all the other flights and the scrambling of fighter planes.

"but are you really going to tell me that Mayor Nagin's failture to commandeer the buses to evacuate the people of his city is racist? Or his failure to make sure that the Superdome had adequate supplies? Because honestly, that would have saved the most lives--had Mayor Nagin done those things, with readily available resources before the storm, many lives would have been saved. His failure to do so was purely incompetence on his part."

Perhaps you're right about the mayor, I really don't know. I'm no expert on Louisiana politics. But look at what I said about racism:

"All of us know, deep in our hearts, that this was racist, that had those in the Superdome been white rather than black, they would have been helped sooner."

I'm referring to the post-storm neglect, the lack of urgency, as racist.
on Sep 07, 2005
But allow me to correct you - 9-11 took place in three states not one. Plus there were many things going on that day for which Guiliani had no responsibility, not least the grounding of all the other flights and the scrambling of fighter planes.


Correction taken--I clearly need some coffee. But my point still stands. The focal point of the catastrophy was in one very small geographic area, a couple of blocks of NYC. The second hit was on a military target--they were well prepared to respond. The scale of 9/11 was much, much different and the comparisons can not be easily made--that's my only point. On 9/11 you weren't trying to rehouse 100,000 people, you didn't need to have food supplies available to them for days, and the streets coming in weren't blocked off. Rescue workers could get to the attacked areas.

The grounding of flights and the scrambling of plane are all clearly in jurisdiction of the federal government. I suppose in a very long winded, not very clear way, that is what I am saying. There were juridisdictional issues here that weren't dealt with on 9/11.


Perhaps you're right about the mayor, I really don't know. I'm no expert on Louisiana politics. But look at what I said about racism:

"All of us know, deep in our hearts, that this was racist, that had those in the Superdome been white rather than black, they would have been helped sooner."

I'm referring to the post-storm neglect, the lack of urgency, as racist.


Again, I am clearly not being articulate, because I would say that the mayor has a big role to play here. The mayor set up the Superdome as a shelter of last resort instead of preparing it for the fact that it may have to house people for a couple of days. When we are told to make disaster kits here, we are told to have supplies for five days--the mayor even encouraged people going to the Superdome to bring supplies for that long. What he should have done was have them available before the storm.

I'm not, for a minute, arguing that the rescue mission went off without a glitch--it was slow and bogged down. But I think that there is a lot of blame to be given to a lot of people and I have a hard time when we simply call the black mayor incompetent, but the white president racist.
on Sep 07, 2005
Again, I never called a specific person racist, I merely stated that those people would never have been left to rot if they were white. I'm blaming a hell of a lot of people for this, not just Bush.

My comparison between 9-11 and Katrina was not about the efficiency of the response so much as the human attributes displayed during these disasters.
on Sep 07, 2005
Again, I never called a specific person racist, I merely stated that those people would never have been left to rot if they were white. I'm blaming a hell of a lot of people for this, not just Bush.


sorry, i suppose that was a projection on my part (i should have said administration instead of president), but I am still going to disagree on your second point.
on Sep 07, 2005
Bottom line? During tragedy Americans seem to only be satisfied if we have someone to blame. With no "poster child of evil" to rally around, we have nowhere to place the outburst of negative emotion. Like the radar guided torpedo, if there is no clear target on which to lock on, we will seek a target of oportunity.

Like you said, sometimes tragedy brings out the best, but other times it brings out the worst...

"If you give a man a fish, you fed him for a day... If you teach a man to fish, you have fed him for life... watch him cast his line into the sea of non-tranquility and you soon see him for what he truly is." My own paraphrase of the age old fish story.
on Sep 07, 2005
It's not a ridiculous claim. Most of the people had either wandered to the convention center from the Superdome a day or so before, or had been taken there after being helped from their homes by private citizens. I wrote an article about it, and the best ANYONE could find as far as a mention in the press of the convention center was 11:09 pm Wednesday night, and the press conference in question was Thursday.

Given there are three states and millions of people who need aid, I don't find it odd the man in charge of it ALL would have been unaware of one building the press hadn't even bothered to start covering.