Published on April 24, 2005 By O G San In International
For me, observing the governments of China and Japan squaring off recently is rather like watching Manchester United play Tottenham. Isn't there some way, I ask myself, that both of them could lose?

I say this as someone who has spent several years living in two countries, Taiwan and South Korea, which toil in the shadows of the East Asian giants. Along the way, I've picked up a strong dislike of the right-wing regimes in Tokyo and Beijing.

This part of the world is beset by conflicts which never quite end. The Korean war, as many know, is still technically on, as the two governments here in the peninsula have never reached an agreement beyond an armistice. The Chinese civil war still festers across the Taiwan strait. No-one is being killed in this phase of the war, but that may change in the near future.

And, most pertinently, the Second World War, at least in a psychological sense, is still being fought here in the Pacific. Japan's stubborn refusal to properly acknowledge and atone for its crimes in the last century poisons the atmosphere in East Asia, in a way that people outside of this region may not be aware.

Let me give you two examples. Last week I saw a picture on the front of a Korean newspaper showing an anti-Japanese protestor firing a flaming arrow at the ambassador's residence in Seoul. The arrow landed in the grounds of the estate and no-one was hurt. The man in question was, naturally enough, arrested. Given the photographic evidence, a conviction would have been a certainty. Yet, the police released the man without charge, explaining that, given the depth of anti-Japanese feeling at the moment, they didn't wish to pursue the matter further.

Some years ago in Taiwan, while chatting to a young woman, the conversation got round to the Japanese. "I hate them" she stated bluntly. Somewhat surprised that such a sweet person would say such a thing, I enquired as to the reason for her animosity. "The rape of Nanjing, 1937" she replied without hesitation. I found it a little disconcerting that she should base her feelings towards her neighbours on something which happened decades before either of us were born. Having recently finished Iris Chang's account of the massacre, I now see her point.

There is no excuse for firing flaming arrows, or for bluntly saying "I hate them", but the people who were occupied by the Japanese in the last century are well within their rights to feel angry over how Tokyo has addressed its dark past.

The Chinese protestors who were out on the streets recently in protest at Japanes school textbooks are right to be furious with Japan. Yet I can't fully endorse their actions out of a feeling that they are being used by the regime in Beijing. It suited the Politburo to allow the protests to go on, since it gave the people a chance to let off some steam and undermines Japan's case for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council. But having decided this week that detente with Tokyo is the way forward, Hu Jintao has ordered the protests to stop.

The recent demonstrations were not, alas, democracy in action. Exactly the same thing happened in 1999 when the US bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. A friend who was in Beijing at the time told me "The government let the protests go on for a few days, then everyone was put back in their cages."

An occasional burst of angry nationalist protest in China is good for the regime, not least because it distracts attention from problems closer to home. Having abandoned communism, Beijing's legitimacy rests on two things: economic growth and Chinese nationalism. As long as the economy advances and the regime sticks to the tenets of Chinese nationalism - bash Japan, bash Tibet, bash Taiwan - then deomcratic reform can be kicked into the long grass.

So the protests in China, while entirely justified, are counter-productive in the sense that they help, rather than hinder, the survival of a truly despicable government in Beijing.

I want the Chinese government to lose, to have to give way, so that one day the people can chant "down with the government" as they now chant "down with Japan". But I don't want Tokyo to be let off the hook either. If Japan fails to get a seat on the Security Council because of its failure to atone for past wrongs, it will have got exactly what it deserves.

But when Japan and China, the 20th century bully and the 21st century bully, square off, it is like watching elephants fight. In the end, it's the grass that suffers the most.

Comments
on Apr 24, 2005

A great article as always... The Koreans have the same attitude towards Japan and it is a difficult position to argue with. After all the Japanese occupation outlaed the Koran language, cultural displays, and even planted acacia bushes in an attempt to choke out all the pines in Korea! (it is the national tree you see).

on Apr 24, 2005
Thanks, I didn't know that. They also changed the name of the country from "Corea" to "Korea" so as it would come after Japan at sporting events!
on Apr 24, 2005
Well the whole "Korea" thing is a westernization of the name of a long-dead Dynasty : the Koryo (that obviously a Romanization). Koreans call their country something close to Han Gook. (Gook just means country BTW).
on Apr 24, 2005
Japan was remade, China is still steeped in the wrongs that trampled millions.

I wonder, if the Chinese people could really fathom 40 MILLION people purged over the course of a just 3 decades, if perhaps they wouldn't have more to do than hate the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of people who brutalized them.
on Apr 24, 2005
Isn't there some way that BOTH Manchester United AND Spurs could lose? What a brilliant idea! The laws of the game need immediate revision.
on Apr 24, 2005
Isn't there some way that BOTH Manchester United AND Spurs could lose?


Well in a way they both do lose since they are professional soccer teams and not pro teams in a better sport
now back on topic... ahem...
40 MILLION people purged over the course of a just 3 decades,


Sometimes it is better that the human mind doesn't easily comprehend such things...
on Apr 24, 2005
japan did not really change the english spelling of korea's name. it's just a korean legend to stir up some anti-japanese feeling.
on Apr 24, 2005
Soupy,

Who was it that told me this "legend" without indicating that it wasn't true? Hmm...

Greywar,

"Well in a way they both do lose since they are professional soccer teams and not pro teams in a better sport"

You're on thin ice
on Apr 24, 2005
Well in a way they both do lose since they are professional soccer teams and not pro teams in a better sport"

You're on thin ice


--I agree fully OG... go MAN U !!! {actually my second facorite,1st is Celtic}
on May 07, 2005
Hi! Thoughtful article, as ever. However, Just another pov to get more of an all-round picture.
"The Chinese protestors who were out on the streets recently in protest at Japanese school textbooks are right to be furious with Japan." Sure. I've read the Rape of Nanking too (you lent it to me But on the subject of the most recent controversial textbook:
1. It has been condemned by the Japanese Teacher's Union
2. Many Japanese regard it as the work of right-wing nutters, therefore
3. Of Japan's 11,102 Junior High Schools, only 18 have adopted it.

This suggests to me that Japan, after 60 years of democracy is rather like (most) western countries - with a wide swathe of differing opinions each trying to make its way in a free market of ideas...

In contrast I teach in an elementary school in South Korea, a country currently disputing ownership with Japan of a couple of pebbles (Dokdo/Takeshima), currently home to a large number of seagulls. The children are taught (indoctrinated?) by the teachers that Dokdo is our land! (Dokdoneun oori ddang) - [technically correct]. No "ifs", no "buts", no discussion. This might suggest that this rather younger democracy still has a fair way to go before a healthy free market of ideas truly takes off.

Still, that Yasukuni Shrine: no excuse!
on May 08, 2005
Good all-round point, Chakgogka.

I asked my 12 year olds who the rightful owner of Dokdo/Takeshima was. Four said Korea, three said Japan. What can I say? We're more liberal out here in Gyeongi-do.
on May 08, 2005
sooner or later the chinese will refuse to go back to their cages. isnt there some sorta chinese proverb about riding a tiger?
on May 11, 2005
war is cool. I like to see small infants torch from bombs. Nothing like a shocked mom to see her baby die right in front of her. We should take al-quida babys and grill them up on a hibatchi in front of their familys. Baby back ribs, HA, HA, HA.
on May 11, 2005
Don't you have better things to do with your time, Mr. Bush?
on May 11, 2005

Reply #14 By: O G San - 5/11/2005 10:42:12 PM
Don't you have better things to do with your time, Mr. Bush?


--San?! Seriously...you weren't referring to the MF who posted before you?