Unionist leader adamantly refuses to shuffle off into the history books
Published on March 24, 2004 By O G San In International
By all accounts David Trimble, leader of the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP), is a hard man to like. Cold, pedantic and distant, the Bangor man is not the type to attract a large personal following. In spite of this, and of my political differences with him, I can’t help but admire the man. I count myself as a stubborn person but even I must doff my cap to Trimble when it comes to bloody-mindedness.

Trimble was once seen as a hard-line unionist. He won the leadership of his party in 1995 on the back of his “steadfastness” at the first Drumcree stand-off. Back then the thought of Trimble as peacemaker, toast of foreign leaders, Nobel Prize winner, would have seemed absurd.

To give the man his due, in spite of his background, he saw that unionism needed to be part of the peace process. He correctly deduced that a good old-fashioned unionist boycott of the peace talks would be counter-productive. The deal he eventually signed, although unpleasant in many ways to unionists, did secure NI’s place in the UK for as long as a majority wished it. Getting all of nationalist Ireland to accept this principle was an historic step forward.

Suffice to say that the DUP, the Orange Order and half of Trimble’s own party, begged to differ. For them the agreement was a betrayal, a first step to a united Ireland, a reward for republican violence. From the day nearly six years ago that Trimble signed up to the Good Friday Agreement (GFA), he has been a hate figure for hard-line unionists. By agreeing to the release of paramilitary prisoners and to the formation of a government with Sinn Fein, he secured his place in unionist demonography as a “Lundy”.

Extreme unionists have always reserved particular venom for those whom they consider “sell-outs”. Over the past six years Trimble has been the subject of unrelenting pressure. It’s dangerous for him to walk the streets of his own constituency. After narrowly keeping his Westminster seat in 2001, he and his wife were attacked outside the count by a mob. One former friend even suggested that he go off to the woods with a bottle of whiskey and a revolver.

His party’s support has gradually drained away as unionist disaffection with the GFA has increased. Back in 1998 his party had 10 MPs. Only 5 remain today. From being the largest party in NI, almost as of right, the UUP are now third. Perhaps most damagingly of all, Trimble has been the target of unremitting attack from within his own party.

His nemesis, Jeffrey Donaldson, left the party in January having failed several times to overthrow Trimble. Still the back-biting continues as senior “colleagues” call for his head. At his party’s AGM this Saturday he will face not one but two stalking-horse leadership challengers. Now even pro-agreement allies are plotting behind his back, reasoning that Trimble is so unpopular and divisive that he has to go. Poor Davey doesn’t seem to have a friend in the world

Despite all this, Trimble dismisses all talk of resignation. Like a good Ulsterman, he digs in his heels and refuses to budge. As an intelligent man, he must know that his position is now untenable. He must realise that no good can come, either to him or his party, by hanging on to the bitter end. Perhaps then, he’s taking some perverse pleasure in denying his enemies the satisfaction of a quiet exit.

Comments
on Mar 24, 2004
Once again--very well written.

A quiet exit would definately not be Trimble's style.

Trimble can't exit until there is someone to replace him who holds the same ideals, His colleagues might be calling for his head, but Trimble isn't going to throw away everything to let an anti-Agreement Ulster Unionist take over. Trimble has definately put up his share of roadblocks during the peace process--what with his constant harping about the IRA decommissioning (a necessary step, but Trimble will never be satisfied until Gerry Adams stands up and declares "the war is over," --it ain't gonna happen!)--but at the end of the day, Trimble is still a pro-Agreement politician.

Slightly off topic--Trimble is not making friends anywhere these days. He blasted Kerry last week, while praising Bush's peace efforts in the region, and doubting Clinton's. What exactly were Bush's efforts in the region? Are we talking about the time that he met with Blair in Belfast because he was too afraid of the protests in London? You remember, the time that he was so glad to be in "Belfast, Ireland." One would have thought that Trimble would have been a bit peeved by this slip of the tongue.
on Mar 24, 2004
It's worse than that. Bush couldn't go to Belfast, there'd have been too many protestors. He just dropped into Hillsborough Castle for a few hours. It's outside Belfast, so harder for him to hear the voices of protest. He saw as much of Belfast as he did of Baghdad.

I'm sure his faux pas upset Trimble, the man is a notorious pedant.
on Mar 25, 2004
I actually feel very sorry for Trimble. as you said in your article he made the decision that needed making when it needed making. His problem is that he does not have a party. The upper levels of the UUP are completely out of touch with the greater number of their members. They are high jacked and guided by the Orange Order who Trimble has forever alienated from himself. Yet time and time again in the party general meetings he had won the vote despite the opposition. He leads a people but not a party. His best option would really be to quit the UUP and form a moderate unionist party. A party that stuck to the fundamentals of no to voilence and remaining part of the UK but was willing to work with the nationalist for the betterment of Northern Ireland. Many unionists from across the spectrum would vote for that. Most of the pro-agreement unionists would likely also join. The UUP would then be a more extreme party competing for the exact same votes as the DUP. Indeed it would only be a matter of time before the extreme parties merged. This would leave Trimble in charge of a party not tied to the past, united behind a single leader and ready to go out and win votes.

Paul.
on Mar 25, 2004
I wish you were right, but I don't think so. Unionist support for the agreement started to dissipate quickly after it was signed. There are lots of reasons but chief among them would be decommissionig, prisoner releases, continuing paramilitary activity, police reform and Martin McGuinness as Education Minister.

In the 1998 referendum unionists narrowly backed the agreement. The decisive factor was the middle-class, couldn't-care-less unionists who came out to vote for peace. Since then these people have gone back to the golf course and the garden centre, leaving the way clear for Paisley to overtake Trimble.
on Mar 26, 2004
I agree that this middle class are no longer voting but that's because they don't have a unionist party to vote for. I was talking to one of my Unionist friends a few months back and she commented that have the people in the UUP belong in the DUP and she has no intention of voting for either partry. I did suggest she vote for the alliance party then but she wanted to vote for a unionist party. Herself and her friends were very much in favour of the agreement but do have issues with continuing IRA criminal activity. They do realise the difference between terrorism and criminal activity.

Paul.